Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, is set to be recognized as a 'Living Legend of Aviation' at the 21st Annual Living Legends of Aviation Awards in Beverly Hills, but the honor has sparked a wave of controversy and debate. The award, which places him alongside notable names like Buzz Aldrin and Jeff Bezos, is meant to acknowledge his contributions as a military pilot and his work in aviation and aerospace.
However, the decision has been met with skepticism and criticism from various experts and former military figures. Richard Fitzwilliams, a royal commentator, questioned the appropriateness of the term 'living legend' for Prince Harry, asking, "If to him, then why not to every pilot who has seen service?" Fitzwilliams also pointed out that while Prince Harry's founding of the Invictus Games is commendable, labeling him a 'living legend' might be excessive.
Lord Alan West, the former head of the Royal Navy, expressed a similar sentiment, stating, "He is not a living legend of aviation. To suggest he is is pathetic." Retired Army Colonel Richard Kemp, who served in Afghanistan, called the award "celebrities massaging each other's egos" and suggested that there were many others more deserving of such recognition.
Despite these criticisms, Prince Harry's military service is undeniable. He completed two tours in Afghanistan, first as a forward air controller and later as an Apache helicopter pilot. During his ten years in the military, he rose to the rank of Captain and undertook countless training missions in the UK, US, and Australia.
The prince's humanitarian efforts and advocacy for mental wellness, particularly through the Invictus Games - an international sporting event for wounded servicemen and women - have also been significant. His work with charities and organizations such as Travalyst, Sentebale, African Parks, WellChild, and the Invictus Games, highlight his dedication to causes that bring about change for people and places.
In his memoir 'Spare,' Prince Harry openly discussed his military experiences, including his role in missions that resulted in casualties. His transparency about these experiences and the impact of his mother's death on his mental health have been both praised and criticized in public discourse.
The debate over Prince Harry's award highlights the complexities of public recognition, particularly for figures with high-profile backgrounds. While his achievements and contributions are notable, the criticism reflects a broader conversation about the criteria and significance of such honors in the world of aviation and beyond. As the award ceremony approaches, it serves as a reminder of the ongoing discussions surrounding merit, recognition, and the legacy of public figures.
