In the aftermath of the 2024 presidential election, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi publicly criticized President Joe Biden's decision to remain in the race as detrimental to Democratic Party prospects. During a New York Times interview, Pelosi argued that Biden's endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris as his successor stifled competition within the Democratic primaries. "Had the president gotten out sooner, there may have been other candidates in the race," Pelosi remarked, adding that the timing of Biden's withdrawal in July limited the party's ability to regroup effectively.

Biden stepped aside following mounting pressure from within his party and a poorly received debate performance against then-presidential contender Donald Trump. His endorsement of Harris, Pelosi suggested, limited primary dynamics, leaving the party vulnerable in the general election. "The anticipation was that, if the president were to step aside, that there would be an open primary," Pelosi said. "Kamala may have, I think she would have done well... But we don't know that. That didn't happen."

Trump's victory over Harris marked a decisive electoral outcome, with the Associated Press reporting that Trump secured at least 301 Electoral College votes. Notably, it was also the first time Trump captured the popular vote, further intensifying post-election introspection among Democrats.

Pelosi attended Harris's concession speech at Howard University, where observers noted a visibly emotional appearance. On X, formerly Twitter, Pelosi wrote, "We all pray for America's success under the next administration. The peaceful transfer of power is the cornerstone of our democracy."

Her critique of Biden's campaign timing echoed sentiments from other Democrats. Representative Pat Ryan of New York remarked during a CNN interview that Biden had an opportunity to "show he wasn't in it for himself" by stepping down earlier. Political analyst Steven Schier observed that Biden, despite perceived cognitive challenges, may have been better positioned than Harris to win key swing states like Pennsylvania.

Tensions within Democratic circles have only intensified since the election. Anonymous Harris aides pointed fingers at Biden, alleging his extended candidacy undermined Harris's chances. "We ran the best campaign we could, considering Joe Biden was president," one aide said. Meanwhile, former Biden aides dismissed such claims as deflection, with one noting, "How did you spend $1 billion and not win?"

The discord has prompted a flurry of blame within the party. Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman called out those who orchestrated Biden's removal, suggesting they must "own the outcome and fallout." Similarly, New York Congressman Tom Suozzi pointed to the party's preoccupation with "political correctness" as a factor in the loss, referencing attacks from Republicans on issues like law enforcement and cultural topics.

Further criticisms came from New York Representative Ritchie Torres, who argued that far-left factions alienated key demographic groups with divisive messaging. Independent Senator Bernie Sanders, in turn, accused party leadership of abandoning working-class voters, warning that the Democrats' inability to connect with grassroots issues remains a serious concern. Democratic National Committee Chairman Jaime Harrison rejected Sanders' assertion as "straight up BS" on social media, illustrating the widening fractures among the party's leadership.