Nuclear negotiations between the United States and Iran concluded in Geneva without a breakthrough this week, leaving President Donald Trump to decide whether to extend diplomacy or escalate pressure as tensions over Tehran's nuclear program intensify.

Senior officials from Washington and Tehran met in Switzerland in what both sides described as substantive discussions. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said there had been "good progress," but no agreement emerged. The delegations agreed only to reconvene for technical consultations in Vienna next week, underscoring the fragility of the diplomatic channel.

The White House had publicly framed the talks as evidence that diplomacy remained viable. According to CNN, Mr. Trump has been presented with several options ranging from continued negotiations to authorizing military strikes. The administration has not detailed a timeline for a decision.

The specter of force reportedly hovered over the final hours of the Geneva round. The Guardian reported that the possibility of military action complicated the environment and deepened mistrust between the parties. Iranian officials have repeatedly stated they will not negotiate under threat.

The collapse renews a debate that has defined U.S.-Iran relations for more than a decade: whether coercion or engagement is more effective in constraining Iran's nuclear ambitions.

Previous military actions targeting Iranian facilities did not permanently halt enrichment activities. Despite Mr. Trump's statement last year that Iran's nuclear capability had been "obliterated," enrichment and technical advances have continued, according to international monitoring reports.

At the center of the impasse is a fundamental disagreement over intent. Mr. Trump has suggested Tehran ultimately seeks a nuclear weapon. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has denied that objective, and a U.S. intelligence assessment last year found no definitive evidence that Iran had decided to build a bomb, BBC News reported.

Araghchi reiterated Iran's position publicly, writing, "Iran will under no circumstances ever develop a nuclear weapon."

European governments and Gulf states are monitoring developments closely. Any shift toward military action could have immediate economic implications, particularly in energy markets, where supply disruptions in the Persian Gulf would affect global prices.

The broader strategic landscape is also in flux. Mr. Trump referenced Iran during his recent State of the Union address but did not outline specific next steps. Instead, he reiterated that Iran poses a serious threat, leaving allies and adversaries alike parsing the administration's next move.

Inside Iran, state media characterized the stalled talks as evidence that Washington remains unreliable, while officials warned against military miscalculation. Al Jazeera reported that Tehran signaled it would not continue discussions under overt pressure.