Megyn Kelly has vocally criticized Meghan Markle's self-description as a "feminist" on the newly launched Sussex.com website. The contention arose following the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's decision to use their royal titles and crest on their personal website, leading to backlash from various quarters.

Kelly, in a discussion with Daily Mail columnist Maureen Callahan, expressed skepticism about Markle's feminist assertions, particularly in light of past allegations about her treatment of staff and her behavior toward senior royal figures. "The amount of staff she has chased out, all women. Her tantrums, her tirades," Kelly remarked, questioning the alignment of such actions with feminist principles.

The About Us section of Sussex.com introduces Meghan Markle as a "feminist and champion of human rights and gender equity," highlighting her lifelong advocacy for women and girls. However, Kelly and Callahan challenge this portrayal, citing instances they believe contradict Markle's feminist stance, including a controversial curtsy depicted in the couple's Netflix special, which they argue displayed contempt rather than reverence for Queen Elizabeth II.

Callahan's critique extends to Markle's perceived lack of appreciation for the Queen, suggesting that true feminism would entail honoring the lifelong dedication of figures like the Queen to their roles. "She's not a feminist," Callahan concluded, pointing to the disparity between Markle's claimed advocacy and her actions.

Meghan Markle
(Photo : Daniel Leal-Olivas/Pool via REUTERS)
Meghan Markle has said in court documents that some members of the royal family have been cashing in on their royal status.

The launch of Sussex.com has not only reignited discussions about the Sussexes' use of their royal titles for what some perceive as commercial purposes but has also drawn attention to the couple's ongoing efforts to carve out a new identity post-Megxit. The website, which is expected to serve as a platform for personal and official updates from the couple, has been criticized for its potential commercial undertones, with royal insiders warning against any hint of commercialism linked to their royal titles.

Despite the controversy, a source close to Harry and Meghan defended their use of the Sussex title, asserting that it is both a fact and their family name. This defense comes amidst broader scrutiny of the couple's ventures since their departure from the Royal Family, including lucrative deals with Netflix and Penguin Books for projects like the "Harry and Meghan" docuseries and Prince Harry's memoir "Spare."

As the debate over Meghan Markle's feminist credentials unfolds, it underscores the complex interplay between public personas, personal branding, and the substantive actions that define one's commitment to advocacy and equity. With Kelly and Callahan's criticisms casting a shadow over Markle's claims, the conversation around feminism, royalty, and the responsibilities of public figures continues to evolve, reflecting broader societal discussions about authenticity, advocacy, and the meaning of true feminist action.