With President-elect Donald Trump poised to begin another term, the New York Times editorial board urges citizens and leaders to remain steadfast. It cites examples of how Trump's intimidation tactics threaten to dismantle checks and balances, warning that backing down emboldens further abuses of power.
A lengthy piece that was published by the editorial board of the New York Times warning readers against becoming complacent and encouraging them to demonstrate "courage and resilience" during the second term of President-elect Donald Trump's presidency has been published.
The editorial begins by demonstrating the various methods that Trump has employed over the years in order to intimidate his detractors and political adversaries. This has been done with the intention of removing any obstacles that may prevent him from utilizing the power of the presidency to carry out his will without being held accountable.
The board says that his aim is to make dissent unpalatable in order to discourage elected officials, judges, CEOs, and others from carrying out their duties in a way that challenges him or holds him accountable. Thus, the intention is essentially the same.
The editors of the New York Times, however, contend that such concerns must not be permitted to undermine the system of checks and balances.
The board doubles down by saying that the leaders and institutions of the United States of America must not be deterred. As they continue to do the specific duties that they have been assigned within our democratic system, they will be required to demonstrate bravery and resiliency in the face of Trump's efforts. They also point out that complete vigilance is essential, that by caving in to pressure or justifying that doing the right thing isn't worth the hassle, anxiety, or danger, institutions not only encourage more abuses in the future, but they also undermine their own authority and influence.
Also, the editors caution those in positions of authority in government and business against the notion that if they show loyalty to Trump, they would be protected from his retribution, The Raw Story shares.
"Despite Mr. Trump's transactional nature, no one can count on remaining in his good graces without continued unconditional fealty," they argue. "(Ask those in his own inner circle who justified or turned a blind eye to misbehavior again and again, only to be cast out for a single episode of standing up to his excesses.) Any advantage gained may be fleeting; any risk overcome may return."
